Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?
1London Hub for Trials Methodology Research, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK 2Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Correspondence to: D J Fisher [email protected] Additional material is published online only. To view please visit the journal online. Cite this as: BMJ 2017;356:j573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/...
متن کاملA clustering method to identify who benefits most from the treatment group in clinical trials
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the most compelling need is to determine whether the treatment condition was more effective than control. However, it is generally recognized that not all participants in the treatment group of most clinical trials benefit equally. While subgroup analyses are often used to compare treatment effectiveness across pre-determined subgroups categorized by pati...
متن کاملWho benefits most from THC:CBD spray? Learning from clinical experience.
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) represent a diverse and heterogeneous population varying in terms of disease type, its severity and variable progression/time-course, and with regard to the wide range of presenting symptoms. Consequently, detailed experience with individual patients is important to provide examples of therapy to specific patient types. In this article, real-life data from ...
متن کاملWho Benefits from Granulomas, Mycobacteria or Host?
By investigating host-pathogen interactions in zebrafish using intravital imaging, Davis and Ramakrishnan (2009) provide evidence that aggregates of immune cells known as granulomas, long thought to constrain mycobacterial infection, may instead facilitate its spread.
متن کاملWho benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study.
AIMS This meta-analysis sought to identify which subgroups of clients with severe mental illness (SMI) benefited from evidence-based supported employment. METHODS We used meta-analysis to pool the samples from 4 randomized controlled trials comparing the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment to well-regarded vocational approaches using stepwise models and broker...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0959-8138,1756-1833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j573